In Defense of the Indefensible: The Excruciating Convolutions of E. Michael Jones.

Being no stranger to the history of Renaissance papal dissimulation with regard to the incremental process of granting permission for the renting of money under a variety of pretexts, I was not beguiled by the semantic misdirection in Fiducia Supplicans. I did not succumb, as E. Michael Jones falsely alleges, to the straw man set up by papal apologists who have made the controversy a question of whether the document is a stepping stone toward the endorsement of gay marriage.

https://michaelhoffman.substack.com/p/in-defense-of-the-indefensible-the